The Meaning of the Sankofa Bird


The concept of SANKOFA is derived from King Adinkera of the Akan people of West Afrika. SANKOFA is expressed in the Akan language as "se wo were fi na wosan kofa a yenki."
Literally translated it means "it is not taboo to go back and fetch what you forgot".

"Sankofa" teaches us that we must go back to our roots in order to move forward. That is, we should reach back and gather the best of what our past has to teach us, so that we can achieve our full potential as we move forward. Whatever we have lost, forgotten, forgone or been stripped of, can be reclaimed, revived, preserved and perpetuated.

Visually and symbolically "Sankofa" is expressed as a mythic bird that never forgets the innate power of his (her) heritage and therefore is able to fly beyond the limitations of expectation (thanks aunt prema).

Hiroshima and Nagasaki...

Hiroshima and Nagasaki...
When Racism and Foreign Policy Collide

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

More from Tim Wise, Racial Justice Ally

White Privilege, White Entitlement and the 2008 Election
Created 09/13/2008 - 3:44pm
A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION by Tim Wise
For those who still canʼt grasp the concept of white privilege, or who are constantly looking for some easy-to-understand examples of it, perhaps this list will help.
White privilege is when you can get pregnant at seventeen like Bristol Palin and everyone is quick to insist that your life and that of your family is a personal matter, and that no one has a right to judge you or your parents, because "every family has challenges," even as black and Latino families with similar "challenges" are regularly typified as irresponsible, pathological and arbiters of social decay.
White privilege is when you can call yourself a "fuckinʼ redneck," like Bristol Palinʼs boyfriend does, and talk about how if anyone messes with you, you'll "kick their fuckin' ass," and talk about how you like to "shoot shit" for fun, and still be viewed as a responsible, all-American boy (and a great son-in-law to be) rather than a thug.
White privilege is when you can attend four different colleges in six years like Sarah Palin did (one of which you basically failed out of, then returned to after making up some coursework at a community college), and no one questions your intelligence or commitment to achievement, whereas a person of color who did this would be viewed as unfit for college, and probably someone who only got in in the first place because of affirmative action.
White privilege is when you can claim that being mayor of a town smaller than most medium-sized colleges, and then Governor of a state with about the same number of people as the lower fifth of the island of Manhattan, makes you ready to potentially be president, and people donʼt all piss on themselves with laughter, while being a black U.S. Senator, two-term state Senator, and constitutional law scholar, means youʼre "untested."
White privilege is being able to say that you support the words "under God" in the pledge of allegiance because "if it was good enough for the founding fathers, itʼs good enough for me," and not be immediately disqualified from holding office--since, after all, the pledge was written in the late 1800s and the "under God" part wasnʼt added until the 1950s--while believing that reading accused criminals and terrorists their rights (because, ya know, the Constitution, which you used to teach at a prestigious law school requires it), is a dangerous and silly idea only supported by mushy liberals.
White privilege is being able to be a gun enthusiast and not make people immediately scared of you. White privilege is being able to have a husband who was a member of an extremist political party that wants your state to secede from the Union, and whose motto was "Alaska first," and no one questions your patriotism or that of your family, while if you're black and your spouse merely fails to come to a 9/11 memorial so she can be home with her kids on the first day of school, people immediately think sheʼs being disrespectful.
White privilege is being able to make fun of community organizers and the work they do--like, among other things, fight for the right of women to vote, or for civil rights, or the 8-hour workday, or an end to child labor--and people think youʼre being pithy and tough, but if you merely question the experience of a small town mayor and 18-month governor with no foreign policy expertise beyond a class she took in college--youʼre somehow being mean, or even sexist.
White privilege is being able to convince white women who donʼt even agree with you on any substantive issue to vote for you and your running mate anyway, because all of a sudden your presence on the ticket has inspired confidence in these same white women, and made them give your party a "second look."
White privilege is being able to fire people who didnʼt support your political campaigns and not be accused of abusing your power or being a typical politician who engages in favoritism, while being black and merely knowing some folks from the old-line political machines in Chicago means you must be corrupt.
White privilege is being able to attend churches over the years whose pastors say that people who voted for John Kerry or merely criticize George W. Bush are going to hell, and that the U.S. is an explicitly Christian nation and the job of Christians is to bring Christian theological principles into government, and who bring in speakers who say the conflict in the Middle East is Godʼs punishment on Jews for rejecting Jesus, and everyone can still think youʼre just a good church-going Christian, but if youʼre black and friends with a black pastor who has noted (as have Colin Powell and the U.S. Department of Defense) that terrorist attacks are often the result of U.S. foreign policy and who talks about the history of racism and its effect on black people, youʼre an extremist who probably hates America.
White privilege is not knowing what the Bush Doctrine is when asked by a reporter, and then people get angry at the reporter for asking you such a "trick question," while being black and merely refusing to give one-word answers to the queries of Bill OʼReilly means youʼre dodging the question, or trying to seem overly intellectual and nuanced.
White privilege is being able to claim your experience as a POW has anything at all to do with your fitness for president, while being black and experiencing racism is, as Sarah Palin has referred to it, a "light" burden.
And finally, white privilege is the only thing that could possibly allow someone to become president when he has voted with George W. Bush 90 percent of the time, even as unemployment is skyrocketing, people are losing their homes, inflation is rising, and the U.S. is increasingly isolated from world opinion, just because white voters arenʼt sure about that whole "change" thing. Ya know, itʼs just too vague and ill-defined, unlike, say, four more years of the same, which is very concrete and certain.
White privilege is, in short, the problem.

5 comments:

Melanie said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Melanie said...

"It's all about blending philosophies to come up with a working solution." Interesting that this is one of the first things on your page yet your "citations" have you come across as very racist.

I'm sorry I do not agree with the comments from Tim Wise, being a white woman I personally do not see Levi (Bristol Palin's finance) as being an All-American Boy and I do see their actions of getting pregnant and dropping out of school as being irresponsible.

My perception of inflamitory comments like these ... create more division than that of collaboration. You are taking on the risk of being too sided and with that people will tune you out instead of listening to what you have to say.

I also disagree about your concept of "White privilege." I think that is simplifying it a little too much. Not all whites are privileged - in my experiences I have come across more people of color that have had much more of a benefit than I have personally had and it was because of their ranking on the economic totem pole not because of their race.

How do you refer to those who are of color and are "privileged" do they then classify as "white?" By entitling privilege as only being white you are entrapping yourself. Sure race is engrained in every part of our life but race is not the only factor - when it comes to privilege.

Paying attention to the political race this year has stirred up many emotions. I was saddened to come across an uninformed gentleman speak out against the injustices against his race. His intentions were valid but he ran into the trap of only thinking about the black community and solely focusing on what can you do for the black community. Watch the link - hosted on a mutally bigoted page on you tube.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pod1Kr-q6us

Forcing people to pick "teams" does not work. We need to work on a collaboration as a whole to try to institute change. I liked your quote - "It's all about blending philosophies to come up with a working solution" - but I think that we need to work a little more on the blending aspect.

The Sankofa Project said...

melanie,

who is very racist? the author, the poster...who?

how would you feel about posting your comment to the blog?

i think your points are worth debate and that is the whole point of the blog.

i agree that blending needs to happen, but PLEASE dont think that malcolm and martin were "blended" about anything, without debating the issues first and continuously.

i dont understand why people are in such a hurry to blend. does the fighting offend you in some way? should i really care about offending someone with my truth (i didnt even post the blog, but i agree with it)? Why should that matter? Why should peoples feeling being hurt matter?

the people who will tune out, were not ready for the conversation.

and a reminder, even though you have been through a training, i think your comment about white privi needs to be examined. its called white privi, because we are talking about racism. there is also male privi, hetero privi, economic privi, etc...

no one denies this, but we are not here to talk about "other types" of privi. this is the Sankofa project, and we are here to discuss race and racism.

Melanie said...

I have no problem with posting - I already did though (it's under the comments from the article) as for my definition of racism, I think that this best simplifies it "hatred or intolerance of another race or other races." I do not believe that you or your friend (the author) are racist, but I believe that the author is making very sweeping generalizations that could be portrayed as racist. And that in my opinion is dangerous to your and Joyce's cause.

If you want to make a difference you WILL WANT people to listen. And stating that they are not ready to hear/have the conversation - is not going to change anything. So then are you only going to talk to people who believe the same as you then? Where is the progress in that.

Now to answer some of your questions ...

"i agree that blending needs to happen, but PLEASE dont think that malcolm and martin were "blended" about anything, without debating the issues first, AND perhaps more importantly, CONTINUOUSLY. "

As for Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm I realize that they are two different people who went about things in two different ways but the end result is that they wanted more freedom and acknowledgement for the black race. We all need to work together - sure many will get offended by the conversation but they still must be open to listen - or all your efforts will be vain.

i dont understand why people are in such a hurry to blend.

What is wrong with blending? My assumption is that people are in such a hurry to blend because THEY ARE TIRED of the fighting. In today's society negativity prevails, people are fighting economic woes, social, family, healthcare, jobs etc. I don't understand WHY YOU WOULDN'T be in a hurry to blend. Blending does not take away from your heritage at all (in my book) but it would give everyone an equal opportunity for success. Why are YOU so hung up on fighting? Then the question arises as to what your goal is?

does the fighting offend you in some way?

Fighting does not offend me. But if two people are banging their heads against the wall and neither one compremises then nothing is accomplished. That's why you need people to listen.

should i really care about offending someone with my truth (i didnt even post the blog, but i agree with it)? Why should that matter?

Okay, first of all - it's kind of underlining that you agree with the post otherwise you would not post it and I take no offense to that. You are entitled to your own opinion, as am I. But realize that this is YOUR truth. And like I described in my comment I don't agree with it. When the author makes generalizations like White Privilege is .... you are segregating everyone who is white into automatically believing this manifesto. That to me is the equivelent of automatically assuming that every black person is going to steal your wallet. Which is wrong, unfair and to me racist.

My worry is that Why should peoples feeling being hurt matter in the broader context of racism?

Are your feelings hurt when your automatically pre-judged?

Racism to me is not just a single topic - it is intertwinded in many aspects socially, economically and politically. That's why I have a hard time seperating it out solely. I realize that there are many privileges in life. We will always have them, unless the United States of America is attacked by Russia and China and becomes communist. We are a society that feeds on the difference between the haves and haves-not. We do not live in a fair society - the question is what will we do about it. I commend you for bringing up points but you still need people to listen - so my comment was intended to be a warning of possibly shutting out your audience.

I agree with yours and Joyce's efforts and I value the 2 workshops that I had attended ... I did learn alot from them. Which is why I brought my family in to also learn from the work that you two have done and are doing. I believe in the potential and recognize the need for discussion and change.

Now a couple questions for you - what did you think of the video I posted? How did you feel about that young gentleman? What did you feel about Barack Obama's response?

I realize that during this election things have been very heated and I've been astounded and angered by people that just don't listen and only believe what they are told (following like blind sheep) and it's hard to combat that. I too would like to continue this conversation - I believe that we have alot to learn from each other (and that is not just segregated to just you and I) but we need to work together - or else we will continuely be fighting for our own causes with little to no progress made.

If I offended you I am sorry, but I respect you. I respect your beliefs and respect that you have the right to your opinion as do I. Maybe your more Malcolm and I'm just a little more Martin Luther King Jr. I just hope that we're working toward the same goal?

Theory said...

I think white privilege is a very hard concept for folks to get...particularly white folks who get to experience it without having to acknowledge it.

That's the beauty of privilege. You have the privilege of "not" seeing it.

And Melanie, I have to disagree. Yes, you may be disadvantaged economically, but there are some ways that you benefit in this society just because you are white. And yes, there are other forms of privilege. For example, as an able-bodied person, society grants me certain privileges that my disabled friends do not enjoy. If I am to say that I am truly an ally to them AND a person who believes in social justice and equality for all....I first have to acknoledge my privilege.

I think the fact that you either cannot or will not acknowledge white privilege means that maybe you're not ready to have a truthful conversation about how this society is set up to benefit some simply because of their skin, or wealth, or mobility, etc.

You may be disadvantaged in some ways, but trust, you benefit from white privilege in ways that you obviously don't recognize because you don't have to.

If you've taken Joyce's and Delma's workshops, then you should be familiar with the "white privilege checklist" that highlights these advantages in a very profound way.

Lastly, I think that sometimes, for some people, particularly those who enjoy certain privileges, the idea of blending means assimilition. This idea that we have to adopt the cultural viewpoint that is consistent with the dominant, American, way of thinking is wrong-headed. This country was made on the blood, sweat, tears, and bodies of people of color. People that were forced to give up their histories, names, cultures, religions, and ways of life to "blend" with the culture of their masters. To this day, most African Americans cannot trace their ancestry back beyond slavery. We were severed. My last name, "Thomas" is the name of my slave owner, not my true descendents. The fact that (with a little work) most white people can trace back their family origins and names, speaks to privilege that I, as a black woman do not enjoy. My ancestors were beat until they accepted their master's name and religion. They were not allowed to even acknowledge that they had an existence and intricate faith system prior to enslavement.

Subsequently, they were punished or killed for trying to hold on to the to the land, customs, and histories that made them who they were.

Essentially, they were stripped of identity and forced to "blend" with their captors. When they refused to do this, they paid with their lives.

With that being said, true blending is a respect and appreciation for cultural and racial differences and a clear understanding of the contribution that each cultural perspective brings to the table. Difference is not division.

However, I can understand how "difference" can look like "divison" to those people who simply want to blend "others" into thier culture. For these people, any mention of difference is perceived as a threat.

Any discussion that blacks raise about the very critical issues that face us as a group of people, puts white people who are not ready to acknowledge racism or inequality on the defensive.

Blending is not throwing you into a melting pot until you are the same as me. Blending is acknowledging and celebrating our unique gifts and challenges and allowing them to the space to exist together.

That blending cannot begin until you are able to acknowledge that black people and white people occupy different and unequal spaces in this society.

Just as I cannot fully "blend" with my disabled friend unless I can acknowledge how messed up it is that he cannot go to some of our favorite hang out spots because the building is not handicap-accessible. It's an insult to him for me to act as if I'm not more advantaged in him in this way or to pretend as if he and I share the same plight.

The way that you proclaim to be for social justice but refuse to critique the position that you occupy rings with the same insincerity.


Peace,
Tasha